Three disputes block a Senate vote


The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, H.R. 3633, otherwise known as the CLARITY Act, remained at 423 on the Senate legislative calendar as America’s 250th birthday passed on July 4, 2026, with no date set for a vote, no repeal motion filed, and three interlocking disputes still preventing the seven to nine Democratic votes needed to pass the 60-vote threshold under Senate rule. XXII. The White House’s unofficial signature goal came and went without celebration.

The Senate returns from recess on July 13, leaving roughly three usable weeks before the chamber recesses for August recess, a window that Wall Street and Washington analysts have consistently identified as the last realistic gateway to passage of 2026 cryptocurrency regulation.


This is not just a missed deadline. It’s a structural math problem: Republicans hold 53 seats, Senators Josh Hawley and Rand Paul are expected to vote no on the merits, and only two Democrats, Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland, voted for the bill, each with conditions attached to any floor support.

Brian Gardner, chief Washington policy strategist at Stifel, wrote that the bill “probably needs to pass the Senate by the end of July” and that missing the August recess would result in a “material deterioration” in its prospects. Beacon Policy Advisors were more blunt, describing the failure as likely to end the course of 2026 entirely.

explores: The next crypto to explode in Q2

Clarity Act News: How the bill got to Calendar No. 423

The House of Representatives passed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act on July 17, 2025 by a margin of 294-134, with more than 70 Democrats crossing the aisle, the strongest congressional endorsement of digital asset legislation in U.S. history.

The Senate Banking Committee, chaired by Tim Scott of South Carolina, advanced the bill by a vote of 15 to 9 on May 14, 2026, with Scott joining Gallego and Allbrooks. Through calendar eligibility, the bill still requires a cloture motion, a successful recall by 60 votes, formal reconciliation with the accompanying Senate Agriculture Committee measure, and a presidential signature. None of these steps are completed.

Close-up of the dome of the US Capitol building with the American flag.

The compressed schedule is made even more crowded by the Senate’s competing priorities. Majority Leader John Thune must weigh clarity against long-term FISA reauthorization under Section 702 and the annual National Defense Authorization Act.

Each stroke sequence, one on the motion to proceed, and one on the bill itself, could consume the greater part of a week under standard procedure, per CoinSpeaker’s previous analysis of the procedural blockade.

discovers: Best coins to buy in 2026

The three unresolved disputes blocking Senate passage

The first dispute focuses on insider cryptocurrency trading and ethics disclosure. The Office of Government Ethics released President Trump’s 927-page financial disclosure on July 1, 2026, showing nearly $1.4 billion in cryptocurrency-related income through 2025, including $635 million from TRUMP meme token licensing and more than $500 million from World Liberty Financial token sales.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, among the chamber’s most crypto-friendly Democrats, has publicly stated that enforceable language covering government officials’ cryptocurrency holdings is a prerequisite for supporting it. An ethics amendment introduced by Senator Chris Van Hollen failed 11-13 in the Banking Committee, and the White House opposes any provision targeting the president’s personal property, according to Reporting the breakdown of ethical negotiations.

The second dispute involves Section 604, which includes the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) and protects non-custodial software developers from money transfer logging and Bank Secrecy Act obligations, a provision the DeFi regulatory community considers the bill’s most practically significant innovation.

The National District Attorneys Association argued in a letter to Senate leadership that Section 604 would materially weaken criminal investigations related to cryptocurrencies. The White House Crypto Council met with law enforcement groups and received the first-ever approval of the CLARITY Act from the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, but the underlying Section 604 dispute remained unresolved going into recess.

The third controversy concerns the return of the stablecoin. Coinbase earns approximately $1.35 billion annually in USDC rewards revenue; Whether this survives the final text of the bill depends on language that the American Bankers Association says creates a loophole that allows digital asset platforms to offer interest-equivalent returns outside of the GENIUS Act’s ban on issuer-paid interest. The GENIUS Act itself was signed into law on July 18, 2025, with its rulemaking deadline falling on July 18, 2026, the same week the Senate resumes work.

explores: The next crypto to explode in Q2

Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to provide accurate and timely information but should not be considered financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify the information yourself and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.

Web News 3, Cryptocurrency news

Neil Matthew

Neil is a professional cryptocurrency content writer with years of experience. He has written for numerous cryptocurrency websites to report breaking news, and has been hired by all kinds of cryptocurrency projects, to create content that will increase their exposure and attract more potential investors.

Neil Mathew on LinkedIn






Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *