A US District Court in California has denied a petition filed by a Coinbase user who is trying to block the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from accessing his transaction records.
Judge Araceli Martinez Olguin Wednesday’s ruling That the petitioner, Roger Metz, failed to follow mandatory procedural rules requiring notification to the US Attorney General, gave the tax agency another victory in its ongoing efforts to monitor cryptocurrency tax compliance.
The dismissal highlights the procedural hurdles facing investors who try to challenge the government’s broad information-gathering powers. It serves as a stark reminder that suing the federal government requires strict adherence to administrative protocols, regardless of the merits of the privacy arguments involved.
explores: Coinbase settles IRS lawsuit over 600 million customer records
A procedural error ends the privacy attempt
Roger Metz filed a petition in the Northern District of California in May 2025 seeking to dismiss the IRS subpoena issued to Coinbase. The tax agency requested Metz’s financial records to conduct an audit of his 2022 federal tax return. Metz’s legal team argued that the subpoena was overly broad, violated his privacy rights, and failed to meet basic administrative requirements.
According to court filings, Metz asserted that the subpoena was unnecessary because he had already identified the reporting error when he filed in 2022, filed an amendment, and paid the additional tax due before the IRS officially claimed the data in 2024. However, the court did not reach the merits of those arguments.
Judge Martinez Olguin dismissed the case For procedural reasons only. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff suing the U.S. government must send notice to three specified parties within 90 days: the local U.S. attorney, the agency being challenged (the IRS), and the U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C.
While Metz succeeded in notifying the local attorney and the IRS, he admitted failing to serve the prosecutor within the legal framework. “In his dissent, Metz offers no explanation for why he failed to serve the United States within 90 days after filing his petition, much less that he had good cause,” Judge Martinez Olguin wrote. “Dismissal of a claim is appropriate when there is insufficient service of process.”
Erosion of the third-party doctrine
This ruling reinforces the uphill battle that cryptocurrency users face when challenged IRS John Doe summons. The legal landscape has been largely defined by the “third-party doctrine,” a doctrine stemming from a 1976 Supreme Court case. United States v. Millerwhich demonstrated that individuals do not have a Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in records maintained by financial institutions.
Cryptocurrency advocates have long argued that blockchain data is different from traditional banking records, but federal courts have been slow to agree. This dismissal echoes The final failure of James Harperanother cryptocurrency user whose long-running privacy lawsuit against the IRS was dismissed, with the Supreme Court denying certiorari earlier this year.
explores: Cryptocurrency Market in Iran: Nobitex acts as a shield against sanctions
Audit risks and future reports
For US investors, the consequences are clear: centralized exchanges are not privacy vaults. The IRS has successfully used John Doe subpoenas since 2016 to force trading platforms like Coinbase, Kraken, and Circle to hand over user data.
while It is clear that Bitcoin adoption is booming Across the United States, the regulatory infrastructure is tightening to match this scale. Starting in 2026, implementation of Form 1099-DA will require digital asset brokers to report returns directly to the IRS, potentially making these types of recall wars obsolete by automating the data transfer process.
Until direct reporting becomes standard, the IRS will likely continue to use subpoena power to fill the gap. Taxpayers who rely on procedural delays or privacy claims to protect assets find fewer avenues for relief in federal court. With the tightening of mandates, the era of reliance on exchange rate ambiguity in tax planning is effectively over.
discovers: Coinbase settles IRS lawsuit over 600 million customer records
Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to provide accurate and timely information but should not be considered financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify the information yourself and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.
Daniel Francis is a technical writer and Web3 educator specializing in macroeconomics and DeFi mechanics. A crypto native since 2017, Daniel brings his background in cross-chain analytics to author evidence-based reports and detailed guides. It is certified by the Blockchain Council and is dedicated to providing “information gain” that cuts through the market noise to find blockchain’s real-world utility.
