Long holders now control a record-high share of Bitcoin’s circulating supply, a reading that would have been clear evidence of mounting bullish pressure in any previous cycle.
The complication, reported in a May 29 report by on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant, is that this supply concentration coincides with an almost complete halt in demand-side momentum, a configuration that CryptoQuant describes as a buyer drought.
The largest holders of Bitcoin have stopped accumulating.
Dolphin stocks have recorded consecutive lows since September 25, while whale stocks have remained steady since February 26.
Historically, when both groups falter simultaneously, sustained price weakness tends to follow. pic.twitter.com/YA5szi4BkO
— CryptoQuant.com (@cryptoquant_com) May 28, 2026
High conviction among shareholders and the absence of incremental buyers are not mutually exclusive conditions, and for now, the market is living within this paradox.
This news fell as Bitcoin rose +0.5% overnight, barely settling above $73,000 after a -5.5% decline over the past seven days. The daily trading volume is $32.1 billion.
Recording Bitcoin holding without new demand is a structural issue, not a bullish setup
The analytical question is no longer whether long-term bondholders are giving up, they clearly are not. The question is whether the record lack of liquidity in supply, absent a renewed wave of spot buying, acts as a floor or merely a ceiling on volatility, locking Bitcoin into a low-liquidity range where small sell orders have a large impact on prices.
CryptoQuant on-chain data shows that growth in new address creation has fallen to a multi-month low, while coin flows to accumulator addresses have slowed sharply compared to Q1 2026. The realized cap HODL wave – which defines the age distribution of Bitcoin’s realized capitalization – is increasingly dominated by dormant legacy coins, underscoring that its freely tradable float is structurally constrained. This is not in itself an incentive.
Something like that makes sense for $ Bitcoin.
What do you guys think? pic.twitter.com/bo9cfP6oQC
– Ted (@TedPillows) May 29, 2026
Ki Young Joo, CEO of CryptoQuant, described the current environment as one where capital flows have “completely stopped” at around the $90,000 level. Analyst Martin, writing for CryptoQuant, separately noted that 30-day retail demand growth is “extremely negative,” meaning there are no large or small groups making aggressive bids at current levels. When whale exchange activity declines during a price recovery — as on-chain data currently shows — the recovery itself becomes dicey, driven by weak order books rather than true supply absorption.
This is structurally important because a rise in illiquid supply only translates into an uptrend when accompanied by true spot buying. Without it, the market’s low float is less a coiled spring than a quiet room – one in which a sudden macro turn can lead to sharp asymmetric moves under relatively modest selling pressure. This kind of pressure, historically, tends to precede something, not nothing.
Once a series of profit taking occurs, the P&L for Bitcoin investors typically declines for about 18 months.
Since the trend turned in October 2025, the bear market could continue until early 2027.
The trend changes only when unrealized profits rise and realized profits fall. We’re not there yet. pic.twitter.com/fQyIRLu8vv
– Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) May 29, 2026
discovers: Best coins to buy in 2026
Inflows from ETFs have entered the exhaustion phase and the transmission mechanism is weakening
US Bitcoin spot ETF flows, the structural demand driver that has redefined Bitcoin’s institutional ownership base through 2024, have gone from a dominant purchasing power to a marginal one.
Net daily flows tracked SoSoValue It went from the $1 billion range recorded during the ETF launch period into the low millions, with several sessions recording net outflows before settling into a moderate re-accumulation.
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Fidelity’s FBTC remain at the top of the category in terms of assets under management, but the newness premium that led to early institutional allocation appears to have dissipated.
Goldman SachsWall Street’s broader involvement in Bitcoin ETF products has created a structural floor under the price, but setting the floor and providing margin bids are two different functions. The first is in place; The latter has been cooled.
The transport mechanism is important here. When LTH supply is locked in and ETF demand is the main source of increased buying, any exhaustion in ETF flow hits an illiquid market directly. Glassnode data from late 2025 documented exactly this dynamic: a period in which net ETF outflows briefly coincided with a sharp disruption in spot prices before flows stabilized.
Observers are watching The paradox of institutional momentum versus weak price action It will recognize the current configuration as structurally similar. The capital rotation into gold and silver has absorbed risk-off flows that would otherwise have entered Bitcoin, adding the dimension of competing assets to the lack of demand.
Until the crypto clarity bill advances meaningfully in the US or Federal Reserve sentiment changes in a way that reinvigorates risk appetite, it seems unlikely that the ETF bid will accelerate on its own.
discovers: Best Meme Coins You Can Buy for June
Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to provide accurate and timely information but should not be considered financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify the information yourself and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.
Neil is a professional cryptocurrency content writer with years of experience. He has written for numerous cryptocurrency websites to report breaking news, and has been hired by all kinds of cryptocurrency projects, to create content that will increase their exposure and attract more potential investors.
