TL;DR
- Trader Ryan claims that Bitcoin’s bull phases lasted 1,064 days and its bear phases lasted 364 days across recent cycles.
- The theory attracts attention because it provides a simple timing model of Bitcoin cycles.
- Specific date cycle claims can be carefully chosen, so the setup should be treated as a commentary on the speculative market.
<
I’m literally shaking after I found this almost as if someone is going to stalk me after I made the post…
I’m not sure if this is general information but Bitcoin cycles are perfect for the given day
Duration of ATH operation from 2014 to 2017: 1064 days
Duration of ATL operation from 2017 to 2018: 364 days
Running ATH 2018-2021:… pic.twitter.com/MUrQkjRxIh– Ryan (@DodgysDD) June 6, 2026
The trader claims that Bitcoin cycles match the specified number of days
Trader
The post says the Bitcoin bull market runs from a low cycle to a high cycle that lasted 1,064 days in the periods 2014-2017, 2018-2021, and 2022-2025. It also claims that the bear market lasted from peak to trough for 364 days in the 2017-2018 and 2021-2022 phases.
This type of pattern is naturally attractive to traders because it indicates that Bitcoin may move according to a repeatable timing structure. If this is true, it would give market participants a simple calendar-based framework for cycle expectations.
The problem with the ideal mathematics cycle
The danger is that cycle-specific claims are often based on identifying highs and lows. Bitcoin trades continuously, and cycle definitions can change depending on whether the analyst uses intraday highs, closing prices, local highs, macro highs, or exchange-specific data.
This makes cherry picking a real worry. A chart can appear accurate if the analyst chooses dates that fit the model best, while ignoring alternative cycle signs that would break symmetry.
There is also no evidence that Bitcoin is subject to a set timer at the day level. Halvings, liquidity cycles, macro conditions, miner behavior, and investor psychology influence market structure, but none of them guarantee perfect 1,064-day or 364-day windows.
Why is the idea still gaining interest?
Preparation is important because cycle narratives remain strong in the cryptocurrency space. Even when the mathematics is not statistically proven, traders often use cycle charts to frame risk, timing, and sentiment.
This claim also arrives at a time when many Bitcoin traders are trying to determine if the current market is consolidating, distributing, or poised for another macro leg higher. The theory of counting clean days gives this story of uncertainty a simple one.
The safest idea is that Bitcoin cycle timing remains a popular lens, but claims of an exact date deserve skepticism. The numbers are interesting as a novel about the social market; They are not enough on their own to call the next major high or low.
This report is based on X’s attributed post and should be read as market commentary, not as a confirmed price prediction. View share source.
Editing process Bitcoinist focuses on providing well-researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We adhere to strict sourcing standards, and every page is carefully reviewed by our team of senior technology experts and experienced editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content to our readers.
